This idea has been percolating for a while, ever since reading Sophie’s post back in September. When we came back from Christmas Vacation and needed to start flexing all of those now-unpracticed skills that we gained in the fall, the time seemed right to try out this crazy new idea.

### Instructions for Starting the Date

We need all groups of two. Every group needs a whiteboard and a marker.

One person from each group, raise your hand. Just one person from each group. Okay, after a few minutes, you guys will go clockwise. Everyone else will go counterclockwise. So, everyone will move places.

Everyone is going to work on the same problem. So, let’s spend 5 minutes now working on problem 9. Work straight on the whiteboard. We’ll have time at the end for you to copy down anything you want to have in your packet. No pencils. Just straight on the whiteboard. Okay, go!

I tried this first in my regular classes, and we worked on this problem:

In one of the classes, most students had done a lot on the problem already. In the other class, most students had not done anything on the problem yet. It seemed to work just as well in both classes.

### After 5 Minutes

Okay, time to switch! Leave your whiteboard where it is. If you raised your hand before, move clockwise. Everyone else move counterclockwise. *[Note: After doing this once, we didn’t need to go through the hand-raising routine on subsequent days. They were able to sort out having the two people from their first group just move in opposite directions.]* Okay, great. 5 more minutes with this group. Ready, set, go.

Everyone is now with an entirely different partner (in many cases, the partners were pairings that had never happened by choice the entire semester!) and no one had their own work in front of them. There was a tense moment where I wondered whether they would just complain, be exasperated, shut down, or actually do the work of figuring out what the others had done and start adding to it. Amazingly, they started adding to it!

One group simply erased the entire whiteboard and started over, not understanding anything that had been left for them. I didn’t see that happen again in any of the next 4 times that I tried this activity. One group wasn’t making much progress until someone from the next table noticed them and said, “Hey, I’m going there next! Do some work for me!”

When the 5 minutes were up, I looked around and saw that we probably had about 5 more minutes worth of work to do in order to get the boards to a mostly-finished state. So we switched again.

Now, again, a different pairing and completely different work. Most boards are close to being finished and so some puzzling starts to happen. “Why did they do this?” Some had written mostly answers absent of work, and two generations of physics students down the line now had to figure out not only whether the answers were correct, but also how they had even gotten there.

At the end of the 5 minutes, we decided we were finished with the problem and had a board meeting (we all sit on the tables and hold the boards in front of us (but not in front of our faces) so that we can see everyone’s work and look for places we agree/disagree). It was a more interesting meeting than usual since everyone was holding work that wasn’t entirely their own. They sometimes had to try to explain something that they wouldn’t have chosen to do themselves. In some classes, the students voted on the board they thought was best and had that group simply present it. Since the ideas about approaches were rotating about the room, the boards looked similar, but not identical.

### User Notes

There was some time pressure to get work on the board, but it was a good pressure that was absent of any kind of anxiety. The time limit was just about how long you had with that particular board, and when time was up, you were on to the same challenge, just remixed.

Most of the above was a description of how the whiteboarding went in my regular physics classes. In Honors Physics, they loved it so much that it got a mention on the course evaluations as a favorite activity after only trying it once. One class asked to do a momentum problem the same way in our next class meeting (our first try had been a goal-less energy transfer problem) because they knew they needed more practice on that topic before the exam, and they thought this activity would be the best thing to help them.

We wouldn’t want to do this kind of whiteboarding every time, but it seems to be a nice way to break things up. It probably wouldn’t work as well near the beginning of a unit (5 minutes would be a short and frustrating time while they are just developing skills), and it definitely requires a complex enough problem that there can be at least 3 “dates” worth of work done on it.

I will definitely be using this one as often as is reasonable (maybe a couple of times per unit) from now on.

Yay, I’m so glad it worked. Also, your write up was infinitely better than mine! Nice.

Great idea to shake up whiteboarding! I will use this this year!

Love it!! I have been looking for ways to get group work more productive (and to just change things up) so I will definitely be trying this soon!

Thanks for the ideal. This definitely involves higher level thinking.

I have been looking for something to shake my kids up. Trying this tomorrow. Thanks for sharing.

Way cool Kelly!

I Love the “Speed Dating” Idea!

I use something like this to review dissections with my anatomy students. I call it “round robin review” typically with groups of 3.

It begins with each station with a different set of parts. Each student is to become the expert at their set. then one stays behind to review the next set of experts.

The student left behind can be chosen by number “number three stay behind!” or sometimes I use other methods – tallest/shortest stays behind, longest/shortest hair, or even “prettiest eyes”

Students enjoy being the expert.

Love,

dad

Awesome!! Thanks for the idea. I think my kids will really like this.

[…] Speed Dating (again Kelly O’Shea) – https://kellyoshea.wordpress.com/2012/01/22/whiteboard-speed-dating/ […]

Kelly . . . I just posted a note on Grant Wiggins (the guy who wrote the book on backwards design) about goal less problems . . and I got a reply right back! Here is what was said:

I teach physics in 9th grade an am looking at something called goal-less problems. In these situations, the student is given a situation, but is not expressly asked to find one answer. Instead they are asked:

A:) determine what model fits the situation and why

B:) draw, diagram, and graph the situation as many ways as possible

C:) find as many interesting quantities as you can from your diagrams and graphs

Does this follow what you would see as appropriate transfer processes?

I am planning on showing how I would do it.

Have the students do some and then share what they did in a dialog session.

Do one or two goal less problems for a non graded assessment.

Share a few more . . . and finally use goal less problems in lieu of a standard learning goal based assessment (where many teachers always seem to put student applications to non novel situations)

By the way, did I once read that all transfer is either accommodation or assimilation? Is that right?

grantwiggins said:

February 3, 2012 at 6:45 am

Jim:

This sounds just right as a transfer task – with a minor caveat.

The positives seem clear: the students have no specific goal or problem posed that would prompt recall or plugging in of prior knowledge, so you would be seeing what they bring to bear and why – with minimal scaffold or clues. My caveat would be that you need to beware that you are not unwittingly assessing creative thinking in terms of fluency of ideas generated (e.g. ‘find as many interesting quantities…’). Maybe you need to tweak the phrasing to suggest that you are looking not so much for ‘quantity’ as ‘interesting’ data, suggestive of cool underlying patterns or concepts. Because that’s the other side of transfer: generalizing from one’s learnings to bigger ideas that have transfer value going forward. So, to take a simple example: once you see that there are sinusoidal patterns in certain kinds of situations (pendulums), then you might have other data, say with light, to see how far certain patterns can go.

Great thoughts and experiments; let me know how it goes! (Have you tried any of Eric Mazur’s ConcepTests from his Peer Instruction book? They are often goal-less in the same way, but nicely focused also on typical misconceptions.)

[…] Forces unit in Honors Physics at this point. We mixed up the whiteboarding process by doing some speed dating. At the end of one session, they had a board meeting, then voted on the best board. Lucy won best […]

[…] years now, but the other day I learned something new on Kelly O’Shea’s blog post about whiteboard speed dating. Really cool idea. So, I’ve been thinking about how I can implement that idea in my classroom […]

[…] their own before the collision, during the collision, and after the collision. We did two rounds of whiteboard speed dating, my current favorite flavor of whiteboarding, and by the end all but one or two of the groups had […]

[…] is I had every group find a partner group, so I had 5 face offs going on at once. I already do whiteboard speed dating a lot to expose kids to a variety of methods and ideas about a problem, and I will be adding this […]

[…] idea was heavily influenced by @kellyoshea‘s Whiteboard Speed Dating Click over and check out the idea; it really is fantastic! Essentially, students work on their […]

[…] we did during class, however, was to use Kelly O’Shea’s Speed Dating approach to whiteboard problem solving. The students (generally) picked it up easily. It was a pretty good […]

[…] gave students use Kelly O’Shea’s whiteboard speed dating to tackle a goalless free fall problem. My PLC is working on how to develop our students’ […]

[…] lot of students were on a field trip yesterday, so we used whiteboard speed dating to go over yesterday’s problems. Based on what I saw and heard, students have these problems […]

[…] is it requires to students to use just about everything from the trimester. 2nd hour, students did whiteboard speed dating, but I put a couple of goal-less problems first so students didn’t have much time to work on […]

[…] did some whiteboard speed dating for compound circuit problems. I put different problems at different tables and, compared to when […]

[…] needed just a little more practice to firm up their stoichiometry skills, so we did some whiteboard speed dating with problems similar to what will be on tomorrow’s quiz. I was really pleased at the number […]

[…] with empirical and molecular formulas, I have students play a round of whiteboard speed dating (see Kelly O’Shea’s blog) with a crime scene problem. The FBI has analyzed a white powder and they need to know if it […]

[…] part of my effort to focus on lowering the social stakes in my class, I had students do some whiteboard speed dating to go over yesterday’s goal-less problems. There were a lot of great conversations; the best […]

Just did this with my AP scholars 🙂

It definitely highlighted the importance of annotating your work so that the next group can actually follow what you’re doing. Good activity! 10/10 will do again.

[…] another day, while students were learning refraction, I did the same. However, I set up my room “speed-dating” style and as students moved through the room they added something new to the boards. Eventually the […]

[…] to properly construct. (Head over to Kelly OShea’s blog to learn about board meetings and speed dating, two of my favorites for building classroom culture!) Our current situation with the pandemic has […]

[…] doesn’t have to look like a worksheet of identical problems! Check out Kelly Oshea’s Whiteboard Speed dating! It’s a phenomenal activity for several reasons, but at it’s core it’s making […]